Tweet
is it wholly unacceptable to have forest arches fitted to an rs2000, which still retains its nose cone?? i know the thing to have is an X-pack, but i have seen a couple of pictures of cars,with just the arches fitted. is this a strict no no in the world of rs ownership??
-
2Standard arches0%1Series-X arches (X-Pack)0%1Forest Arches0%0 -
Whilst I have voted Series-X it has to be standard or Series X
Forest arches look so much better on a flat front !cheeRS
DAVE
-
dave did u still have a pic of that red rs at longcross with a cone and forest archesComment
-
like this then
I think this looks really well and if my wheel arches were shot and could not afford new wings and 1/4 panels (which I cant ) I think I would put them on
Brian
Comment
-
Have u tried "Just for Men" or the mags that come free with the Sunday papers ?Originally posted by Banishit
Some good WIG deals to be had
cheeRS
DAVE
Comment
-
gone past the wig deal now dont you think
Comment
-
he looks more like FRED than me
cheeRS ROB
MK11 MEMBER 252Comment
-
excuse me I resemble that remarkOriginally posted by robsrs2000he looks more like FRED than me
Comment
-
Dont think so Mr G!sigpic
Too old of a
to be F**ked by kittens
RS MK2 CLUB NO/10
RSOC NO/22171Comment
-
Although i like the forest arches... not too sure on the rs2000...
Prefer the x pack.
Comment
-
hey, those motors look phat!!!!!!!!!!! i wont be so put off sticking them on mine now, if my arches go awolComment
-
Somehow they just dont look right IMO , x pack on a "droop snoot" and forest arches on a flat front , although saying that on another post with forest arches on a droop 2000 they look quite good but the arches are a different coloursigpicComment
Comment