rs2000 with forest arches.....

[lee bishop]

is it wholly unacceptable to have forest arches fitted to an rs2000, which still retains its nose cone?? i know the thing to have is an X-pack, but i have seen a couple of pictures of cars,with just the arches fitted. is this a strict no no in the world of rs ownership??

[RS2000CUSTOM]

Whilst I have voted Series-X it has to be standard or Series X

Forest arches look so much better on a flat front !

[Mex 1t]

dave did u still have a pic of that red rs at longcross with a cone and forest arches

[Banishit]

like this then

I think this looks really well and if my wheel arches were shot and could not afford new wings and 1/4 panels (which I cant ) I think I would put them on

Brian

http://www.redslate.co.uk/upload/pics/wr.jpg

http://www.redslate.co.uk/upload/pics/wr2.jpg

[RS2000CUSTOM]

could not afford new wigs

Brian

Have u tried "Just for Men" or the mags that come free with the Sunday papers ?

Some good WIG deals to be had :clown:

[Banishit]

gone past the wig deal now dont you think

http://www.redslate.co.uk/upload/pics/head.jpg

[robsrs2000]

he looks more like FRED than me :clown:

[Banishit]

he looks more like FRED than me :clown:

excuse me I resemble that remark :drunken:

[paul spence]

Dont think so Mr G!

[M11RF]

Although i like the forest arches... not too sure on the rs2000...

Prefer the x pack.

:geek:

[lee bishop]

hey, those motors look phat!!!!!!!!!!! i wont be so put off sticking them on mine now, if my arches go awol

[GAZ W]

Somehow they just dont look right IMO , x pack on a "droop snoot" and forest arches on a flat front , although saying that on another post with forest arches on a droop 2000 they look quite good but the arches are a different colour